This article is intended to be a quick update to this article.  The original idea is based on the theory propounded by Ken Fischer that suggests that one should not worry about a “top” in the stock market until after the market goes at least 3 months without making a new high.

Three things to note:

*Like all trend-following methods the one detailed in the linked article will experience an occasional whipsaw, i.e., a sell signal at one price followed some time later by a new buy signal with the market at a higher price.

*Like any good trend-following method the real purpose is to help you avoid some significant portion of any major longer-term bear market, i.e., 1973-74, 2000-2002, 2007-2009).

*The secondary purpose is to relieve an investor of that constant “Is this the top, wait, what about this this, this looks like the top, OK never mind, but this, this time it definitely has to be the top” syndrome.

The Rules

For a full explanation of the rules please read the linked article.  In general, though:

*A “Sell alert” occurs when the market makes a 6-month high, then goes 3 full calendar months without piercing that high

*The “trigger” price is the lowest low for the 3 months following the previous high

*A “Sell signal” occurs at the end of the month IF the “trigger” price is pierced to the downside during the current month

*The “trigger” is no longer valid if the S&P 500 makes a high above the high for the previous 6 months prior to an actual “Sell signal”

*If a “Sell signal” occurs then a new “Buy signal” occurs when the S&P 500 makes a high above the high for the previous 6 months

Sounds complicated, but its’s not.  Figure 1 displays the signals and alerts and trigger prices since 2005.

Green Arrows = Buy Signal

Red Arrows = Sell Signal

Red horizontal lines = Sell trigger price

Figure 1 – One Minute a Month Trend-Following Alerts, Trigger prices and Signals (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Note that actual sell signals occurred in 2008, 2011 and 2015.  The signal in 2008 was a life-saver, while the signals in 2011 and 2015 resulted in small whipsaws.  Sorry folks, that’s just the nature of the beast.

Interestingly, there have been two “Sell alerts” in the last year.  The first occurred at the end of April 2018, however, that alert was invalidated at the end of August 2018 when the S&P 500 pierced the previous 6-month high.  Another alert occurred at the end of December 2018.  The “Trigger price” is the December 2018 low of 2346.58.  That trigger is still active but could be invalidated if the month of May 2019 makes a high above whatever the high for April 2019 turns out to be.

The key point here is that despite the volatility and painful sell-offs in October and December of 2018, the “system” has remained on a buy signal.

Where to from here?  We’ll just have to wait and see.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

Anecdotally, I am going to guess that roughly 98% of all articles I read about the housing market are negative regarding the (short-term and long-term) future of housing.  Maybe I am extrapolating but it just seems like an easy thing for people to be negative about.  And given the housing bubble in 2008 and the re-inflation of housing prices in certain locations maybe they are not wrong.

But for now, the stock market does not seem to care.  Since the Christmas Eve low home builder stocks are up roughly 30%.  For people who pay attention to “financial news” this probably comes a surprise.  For people who pay any attention at all to seasonal trends, it should not

Ticker FSHOX

As a proxy for housing stocks we will use Fidelity Select Construction and Housing sector fund, which began trading in 1986.  What we will find is that this sector has a, ahem, large seasonal bias.  Let’s keep it short and sweet.

Figure 1 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in FSHOX ONLY during the months of November through April every year starting in 1986.

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in FSHOX Nov 1 through Apr 30; 10/31/1986-3/31/2019

For the record, FSHOX gained +8,584% during November through April since 1986.

Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in FSHOX ONLY during the months of May through October every year starting in 1987.

Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested in FSHOX May 1 through Oct 31; 10/31/1986-3/31/2019

For the record, FSHOX lost -63% during May through October since 1987.

Figure 3 displays the summary for both the favorable and unfavorable seasonal periods.

Figure 3 – Summary of FSHOX performance (10/31/1986-10/31/2018)

The results in Figure 3 do NOT include the latest bullish period that started on 10/31/2018 and will end on 4/30/19.  From 10/31/18 through 3/31/19 FSHOX is up roughly +13.6%.  Barring an unforeseen collapse, FSHOX will register its 30^th “Up” bullish period in the past 33 years (i.e. 91% winners) at the end of April 2019.

The other key thing to note is that while FSHOX has lost a lot of value during the Bearish months of May through October over the years, on a year-by-year basis it is a 50/50 proposition.

Summary

So, is the housing market about to “collapse” – as so many pundits seem to love to predict?  It beats me.  All I know is that history suggests that the outlook for housing stocks in the next 6 months (starting May 1^st) is less favorable than it was 6 months ago.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

In just 3 months and 2 days the OTC Composite Index is up over 18% so far in 2019.  Given where things stood on Christmas Eve 2018 this has come as a surprise to most investors.  But it should not have.

Based on research presented by Jeffrey Hirsch and The Stock Traders Almanac, we know that the OTC Composite Index has showed a historical tendency to exhibit strength from January 1^st through the 10^th trading day of July during pre-election years.

Figure 1 displays the hypothetical growth of $1,000 invested in the OTC Composite Index only during this roughly 6 and ½ month period of each pre-election year starting in 1975.

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in OTC Composite Jan 1^st through July Trading Day #10 of Pre-Election year

Hard to beat that for consistency.  One thing to note is that during the last 3 previous pre-election years (2007, 2011, 2015) the total results were far less than in previous pre-election years.

Figure 2 – Jan 1 through July Trading Day #10 during Election Years

*-Jan 1 through July Trading Day #10

**-Jan 1 through April 2, 2019

Is 2019 a “return to form”?  Or is there trouble ahead?

As always, time will tell.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services,

It’s April.  So, it “should” be a good time to own energy related stocks.  IMPORTANT NOTE: “Should” is definitely the key word in the previous sentence.

To take a look back, we will consider four Fidelity Select funds that deal in energy-related securities.

*Energy (FSENX) launched in 1981

*Energy Services (FSESX) launched in 1986

*Natural Gas (FSNGX) launched in 1993

*Natural Resources (FNARX) launched in 1997

During each year starting in 1982, we will take the average performance of any of the four that were trading at the time only during the month of April.  So:

*From 1982 through 1985 FSENX was the only fund.

*From 1986 through 1993, we use the average of FSENX and FSESX

*From 1994 through 1996 we average FSENX, FSESX and FSNGX

*And since then we take the average of all four of the above

Figure 1 displays the cumulative growth of $1,000 invested in energy (as described above) ONLY during the month of April each year.

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested ONLY during April in Fidelity Select Sector energy-related funds

Figure 2 displays the year-by-year results for the month of April

Figure 2 – Annual April % +/- ONLY during April in Fidelity Select Sector energy-related funds

Things to note:

*# times UP = 28 (76% of the time)

*# times DOWN = 9 (24% of the time)

*Average UP month = +6.1%

*Average DOWN month = (-2.5%)

*Largest UP month = +17.0% (2009)

*Largest DOWN month = (-6.8%) (2005)

Summary

The Fidelity energy sector funds have showed a gain during the month of April 76% of the time since 1981.  The average up month has been 2.4 times that of the average down month.

So, does this mean that energy funds are “a sure thing” during April 2019?  Far from it.  The reality is that anything can happen.  But successful investing has a lot to do with putting the odds on your side as much as possible.

Historically, the odds seem to favor energies in the month of April.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

Traders are a silly bunch sometimes.  Sometimes they forget the basics like – markets go up, markets go sideways, markets go down, markets get quiet, markets get volatile, and so on.  And then when they get so used to something going one way or doing one thing for so long they start to think that that state of affairs will never end.  Like now.  In a variety of markets.

One way to tell when this is happening is to look at the implied volatility of the options on a given security.  When traders reach that “well, whatever” state of being it is typically accompanied by a decline in IV (The short lesson: all options have some time premium built into their price prior to expiration.  High IV means lots of time premium, low IV means very little time premium) as traders simply lose interest and start to figure that “nothing will ever happen” with that given security.

And of course, markets being what they are, very often they are wrong.

A Cross Section of the Blahs

The charts below display the price action for a variety of ETFs as well as the historical and current IV levels for the options on each.  The point should be self-evident.Figure 1 – Ticker FXE with IV (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 2 – Ticker TLT with IV (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 3 – Ticker UNG with IV (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 4 – Ticker GLD with IV (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 5 – Ticker SLV with IV (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

What should be obvious is that IV for these securities is extremely low – i.e., traders have determined that there is nothing going on in these tickers and there is no expectation for a pickup in volatility any time soon.

Now here are 3 things to note:

*I have no “predictions” to make for any of these, bullish or bearish

*When traders as a group get this complacent they are typically (though importantly, not always) wrong

*When IV is “low”, the options are “cheap”

So, from there we can make the following leap:

*Something surprising may be coming in these markets that will surprise traders

*We don’t know if the surprises will be to the upside or the downside

*We know that the options are cheap

There is an option strategy for that scenario.  It is called a “strangle”, which involves buying both a call and a put at the same strike price and waiting for the underlying security to make a meaningful move in one direction or the other.  Another alternative is the “strangle”, which involves buying a call and a put with different strike prices.

Some Examples

As always, the trades displayed below are NOT “recommendations”, only “examples.”  One thing to note:

*In the world according to me the “correct” range for straddles is options with 60 to 140 days left until expiration.

*Anything less and time decay can work against you heavily and there may not be enough time for the underlying security to make the move required to generate a profit.

*Beyond 140 days you often are dealing with less liquid options which can also be less price sensitive

In this case I am making an exception and going out a little further.  Two reasons for this:

*I have no idea if or when these tickers may actually make a significant move, so I want to give them a lot of time.

*The options are about as cheap as they have ever been, plus longer-term options are more sensitive to changes in volatility.  So, if volatility picks up these options may get more of a time premium “bump”.

Figure 6 – FXE Sep 107 straddle (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 7 – TLT Sep 126-127 strangle (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 8 – UNG Oct 124 straddle (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 9 – GLD Sep 122 straddle (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 10 – SLV Sep 14 strangle (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

With all of the above:

*A significant up move or down move in price will generate a profit

*A continued sideways movement will likely generate a loss

*A sharp rise in implied volatility will help the trade by inflating the time premium built into the options.

Summary

Will the markets highlighted continue to drift or trade within a range between now and September/October?  It’s certainly possible.  Will the example trades highlighted generate a profit?  It beats me.  But that is not the point of this piece.

The point of this piece is simply to highlight:

*That low extremely low IV often highlights complacency and may be followed by more volatile than expected price action

*Options offer a way to play this situation

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

One of my (admittedly, potentially foolish) beliefs is that commodities will outperform stocks again someday.  Possibly someday starting soon (roughly defined as anywhere from today to a year from today) and that the shift will be dramatic and last for a period of 3 to 8 years.

And no, I don’t think I could be any more vague.  But I haven’t really “taken the plunge” (i.e., shifted money from the stock market into commodities in any meaningful way) yet.  But I am keeping a close eye on things.  Rather than rattled off another 1,000 words to explain, I will simply refer you to Figure 1 that tracks the ratio of the S&P Commodity Index to the S&P 500 Index.

Figure 1 – Commodities versus Stocks (Source: www.DailyReckoning.com)

History suggests that “the worm will (eventually) turn.”

Sugar

Let’s focus on one commodity for now.  Sadly, it’s one of my favorites (ranks right up there with coffee).  Sugar.  As you can see in Figures 2 and 3, sugar has a history of contracting in price over a period of time and then alternately – and please excuse my use of the following overly technical terms – “swooping” or “soaring”.Figure 2 – Sugar 1970-1998 (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

Figure 3 – Sugar 1998-2019 (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

Sugar can be traded either in the futures market (each full one-point movement in price equates to $1,120 in contract value).  An alternative for “normal people” is ticker CANE which is the Teucrium Sugar ETF which trades like shares of stock.  See Figure 4.Figure 4 – ETF Ticker CANE (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

As you can see, sugar has been “contracting” in price of late.  Does this mean it is reading to “swoop” or “soar”?  Possibly.  But for those who want to play the bullish side, it is probably a bit too soon to dive in.

Seasonality in Sugar

Figure 5 displays the annual seasonal trend in sugar.  It should be noted that you should NOT expect every year to follow this trend.  It is a display of previous historical tendencies and NOT a roadmap.Figure 5 – Sugar Annual Seasonal Trend (Courtesy Sentimentrader.com)

Still, the primary point is captured nicely in:

Jay’s Trading Maxim #92: One of the keys to long term success is committing capital where the probabilities are (or a least appear to be) in your favor.

February through April is NOT that time for anyone looking to play the long side of sugar.

Figure 6 displays the cumulative results achieved by holding long one sugar futures contract ONLY during the months of February through April every year starting in 1970.

Figure 6 – Cumulative $+(-) holding long sugar futures Feb, Mar, Apr every year since 1970

Some things to note regarding sugar Feb through Apr:

*UP 18 times

*DOWN 31 times

*Average gain = +$2,201

*Average loss = (-$3,377)

*Largest gain = +$6,630 (1974)

*Largest loss = (-$18,424) (1975)

Summary

The point IS NOT to argue that sugar is doomed to plunge between now and the end of April, nor even to argue that it cannot rally strongly between now and then – because it can.

The point IS to merely point out that the odds do not presently favor the bulls, which means – well, see Trading Maxim #92 above.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

Few “investment vehicles” attract more attention than gold.  The shiny stuff.  The precious metal.  The store of value.  Yada, yada, yada.

All my adult life I have seen the articles purporting that gold will be the ultimate asset when “disaster finally strikes.”  And who knows, maybe they’re right.  Still, when I picture myself trying to trade a gold bar for a bag of groceries I am not so sure.  Plus, my own belief is that “(if and) when it all hits the fan” the three most valuable commodities will be canned food, shotgun shells and cabins in the woods.  But that’s just me.

Ticker GLD

Figure 1 displays ticker GLD (an ETF that purportedly tracks the price of gold bullion) with the daily Elliott Wave count generated by ProfitSource by HUBB.  As you can see, it is suggesting a potential price move higher may be in the offing.

Figure 1 – Ticker GLD with Elliott Wave count (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

Figure 2 displays the annual seasonal trend for gold from www.sentimentrader.com.  As you can see the months ahead are not “gangbusters” bullish.  However, I guess the key point in my mind is that it is not bearish.  So, a bullish move would not have to “swim upstream” so to speak.Figure 2 – Gold annual seasonal trend (Courtesy Sentimentrader.com)

OK, the usual caveats.  I am not professing that I am bullish on GLD nor am I “recommending” the trades that follow.  The trades are presented as an example of different ways to play a potentially bullish situation while exposing oneself to only a low dollar risk.

Figure 3 displays the risk curves for buying 1 May GLD 123 call @ $2.15.  The key things to note are:

*A maximum dollar risk of -$215

*Unlimited profit potential

*A breakeven price of $125.15 for GLD shares (trading at $122.97 as I type)

Figure 3 – GLD May 123 call (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 4 displays a bull call spread for GLD

*A maximum dollar risk of -$240

*Maximum profit potential of +$760 (if GLD reaches $129 a share)

*A breakeven price of $125.20 for GLD shares (trading at $122.97 as I type)

Figure 4 – GLD May 124/129 Bull Call spread  (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

At first blush the lower cost and breakeven price plus the unlimited profit potential makes the long call position attractive.  However, a close examination of Figure 5 (which overlays the risk curves for the two trades) reveals that the bull call spread may be more attractive at any price above roughly $126 through roughly $131 a share for GLD.

Figure 5 – Overlay of long call AND bull call spreads for GLD (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Summary

The key points:

*The daily Elliott Wave count from ProfitSource by HUBB (and a whole lot of diehard gold bugs out there) are suggesting gold may move higher soon.  There are ways to “make the play” without risking large sums of capital.

*I personally am not offering any opinion; however, I have highlighted a couple of ways that a trader might play a bullish opinion on gold for less than $250 – i.e., without going out and buying actual physical gold, or assuming the risk of going long gold futures, or even ponying up roughly $12,300 to buy 100 shares of GLD.

How it all works out, only time will tell.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services,

Well it’s not the most obvious pairing in the world.  Nor would I make any claim that it is the greatest pairing in the world.  But under the category of “Is this any way to invest?”, the answer is “Well, it’s one way.”

The Test

We will make this as simple as possible:

*If the current month is January, February or December hold Utilities

*If the current month is March or April hold natural gas

*For all other months hold a money-market fund

Not exactly exciting to say the least.

The Funds

*For utilities we will use ticker FSUTX

*For natural gas we will FSNGX

*For money market we will use ticker VMMXX

Figure 1 – “System” Calendar

The Results

Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested using the rules above (utilities held Dec through Feb, natural gas held March and April, money-market held May through November) versus buying and holding the S&P 500 Index starting in Jan 1993.

Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested using our Utility/Natural Gas strategy

Figure 3 displays some comparative numbers.

Figure 3 – Comparative Results

Summary

So, is this really a viable “system?”  That’s not for me to say.   The “system” has certain favorable qualities (simple, beat the S&P over time, much less volatile and with lower drawdowns than the overall market) but also certain negatives (out of the market 7 months a year, can get left behind in a strong bull market, 100% focused in one sector 5 months a year).

Still, the results do generate some interesting food for thought.  Something to chew on anyway…

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

A lot of eyes are firmly fixed on Utilities at the moment.  And for good reason.  As you can see in Figure 1, the Dow Jones Utilities Average is presently facing a key resistance level.  If it breaks out above the likelihood of a good seasonal rally (more in a moment) increases significantly.Figure 1 – Utilities and resistance (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB) (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

One concern may be the fact that a 5-wave Elliott Wave advance appears to possibly have about run its course (according to the algorithmically drawn wave count from ProfitSource by HUBB which I use).  See Figure 2.Figure 2 – Utilities and Elliott Wave (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

For what it is worth, the March through July timeframe is “typically” favorable for utilities.  Figure 3 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the Fidelity Select Sector Utilities fund (ticker FSUTX) ONLY during the months of March through July each year starting in 1982.

Figure 3 – Growth of $1,000 invested in ticker FSUTX Mar-Jul every year (1982-2018)

For the record:

*# times UP = 29 (78%)

*# times DOWN = 8 (22%)

*Average UP = +9.3%

*Average DOWN = (-5.8%)

*Largest UP = +21.1% (1989)

*Largest DOWN = (-25.8%) (2002)

*Solid performance but obviously by no means nowhere close to “a sure thing”.

*It should be noted that several of the “Down” years occurred when the S&P 500 was already in a pretty clearly established downtrend (2001, 2002 and 2008), i.e., below its 10-month moving average.  See Figure 4.Figure 4 – S&P %00 Index w/10-month moving average (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Summary

Utilities are flirting with new all-time highs and March through July is a “seasonally bullish” period for utilities.  Does that mean “happy days are here again, and we should all be piling into utilities?  Yeah, isn’t that always the thing about the markets?  There is rarely a 100% clear indication for anything.

As always, my “prediction” about what will happen next in utilities is irrelevant and I am NOT pounding the table urging you to pile in.  But I can tell you what I am watching closely at the moment:

*The S&P 500 Index is flirting right around its 10-month moving average (roughly 2,752 on the S&P 500 Index).  If it starts to break down from there then perhaps 2019 may not pan out so well for utilities.

*The Dow Jones Utility Average is facing a serious test of resistance and may run out of steam (according to Elliott Wave).

*But a breakout to the upside could well clear the decks for utilities to be a market leader for the next several months

Focus people, focus.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

But I repeat myself.  Also, as it turns out, the real question may be “when YYY?”  But of course, to get the full picture the first question to ask and answer is “what YYY?”

Ticker YYY

Ticker YYY is an ETF created in 2011 for the sole purpose of offering a product with a “high yield”, i.e., a high dividend yield.  As stated on the www.YieldShares.com website: “The YieldShares High Income ETF seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the ISE High Income™ Index. The Index is comprised of 30 closed-end funds (CEFs) ranked highest overall by the ISE in three criteria: fund yield, discount to net asset value and liquidity.”

First the good news: As I write, the yield on ticker YYY is a whopping 8.94%, which instantly gets the attention of yield hungry investors.  The bad news is that – under that age-old category of “there is no free lunch”, that high yield comes at price.  There is a lot of volatility in the price of the shares and as a buy and hold investment it leaves a lot to be desired.  Figure 1 displays the price action since inception.

Figure 1 – Ticker YYY price performance (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Average 12 month % return has been +6.4% with a maximum drawdown (using monthly total return data) of -22.4%.  Not so hot.

A Seasonal Strategy for YYY

Ticker YYY has a relatively short history, so what follows is not a recommended strategy as much as it is “food for thought.”  First note that YYY has a much higher correlation  (roughly 62%) to the S&P 500 Index than it does to long-term treasuries (roughly 13%) or 7-10-year treasuries (roughly 13%).

The “strategy” below involves holding YYY ONLY during several months that are typically favorable for the stock market.  Specifically:

*Hold ticker YYY ONLY during the months of January through April AND during the month of July

Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested ONLY during the five months listed above (blue) versus holding ticker YYY during ALL other months of the year (orange).

Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested during Jan-Apr plus July (blue) versus all other months (orange); Jul 2011-Feb 2019

The difference is stark.  The relevant numbers are:

Figure 3 – Facts and Figures, Seasonal, Anti-Seasonal and Buy-and-Hold; Jul 2011-Feb 2019

Summary

Does YYY offer a high yield?  It sure does.  Is it a good investment? That is an entirely different question.  In its roughly 7.5-year existence it has had a lot of ups and downs, a great deal of volatility and not a stellar total return when looked at on a buy-and-hold basis.

However, because it has a strong correlation to the stock market it does appear that there might a potential seasonal  component that may be of value.  The bottom line is that the blue equity curve line in Figure 2 is far more appealing than the volatile bar chart in Figure 1.

While this is not something that anyone should “jump into”, it may be something to keep an eye on for investors looking for strong yield without all of the volatility.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer:  The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources.  While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information.  The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.