The chart in Figure 1 is not the “be all, end all” of overbought/oversold indicators. Likewise, given the unprecedented nature of the current situation, please understand that it is NOT intended to indicate a “buy” or “all clear” signal. It is simply intended to highlight the extremely oversold nature of the current market environment.
Ticker
VXO is the “old” VIX Index, which measures the implied volatility of options on
the S&P 100 Index (the “new” or current VIX Index uses options on the
S&P 500 Index). When fear strikes,
VXO “spikes” to sharply higher levels.
Figure
1 displays VXO with the 15-day and 73-day moving averages of daily
readings. Note that when VXO “spikes”
higher, the gap between the 15-day and 73-day averages widens significantly for
a period of time. This gap often –
although importantly, not always – accompanies “peak fear” for that move.
Figure
1 – VXO Index with 15-day and 73-day moving averages
Because the 14-day average reacts more quickly than the 73-day average, one way to measure “peak fear” is by dividing the 15-day moving average by the 73-day moving average. See Figure 2.
Figure
2 – VXO 15-day MA divided by VXO 73-day MA
*Typically
a reading over above 1.40 is a sign of an extremely oversold market
*As of 3/16/20, this VXO 15/73 ratio stood at a record high 2.333
For
perspective, Figure 3 displays:
*The
S&P 100 Index (OEX) in blue
*The VXO 15/73 ratio (x 200 to make it more easily viewable) in red
Figure
3 – S&P 100 Index versus VXO 15/73 day MA ratio
What
does it all mean? If history is a guide,
it suggests that the worst of this particular downdraft has likely already
occurred. Unfortunately, it DOES NOT
mean that there cannot be further sizeable down moves nor that a massive new
rally will unfold anytime soon.
What
it does show is that fear is at an extremely elevated level. Typically, this can mark an opportunity for,
a) skillful traders, and b) investors with a long-term horizon.
Here’s
hoping.
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
The fear associated with “current events” has pushed the implied volatility for options on many stocks to staggeringly high levels. This creates the potential – and please make careful note of the word “potential” – to sell out-of-the-money put options as a way to, a) generate income, and/or b) buy stock at well below current levels.
*I
am not recommending that anyone pursue the strategy I am highlighting (it’s known
as a cash secured put) – it is presented merely as “one way to play” in an
extremely volatile market clouded in nearly unprecedented uncertainty. Every trader has to learn the pro’s and con’s
and decide for themselves.
*The purpose of the strategy in these articles is to sell far out-of-the-money options when implied volatility – and thus time premiums – are exorbitantly high, and to hopefully buy them back when IV abates. However, being required to buy the shares if necessary is part of the deal.
*That being said, the goal of the strategy discussed in these articles is not really to “accumulate shares of stock at below current price levels” (although that is one common use for this strategy), rather the belief (hope?) is that someday the cloud of panic will abate – if only temporarily – and that implied volatility levels will plummet from their current stratospheric heights, and many put options will collapse in price as time premium evaporates (due solely to the decline in IV). At that point – ideally – the options can be bought back early at a profit rather than being held until expiration.
*My
opinion is that this strategy should ONLY be used in a “cash secured” manner,
i.e., you need to have enough cash in your account to buy the underlying stock
at the strike price if necessary. DO NOT
sell naked puts in this market on margin (again, just my opinion) – the risk in
this environment is simply too great.
*If
you are not willing to buy the underlying stock at the strike price – again, in
my opinion – DO NOT sell cash secured puts.
Why? Because if the price of the
stock does decline you either typically have to ultimately buy the stock or buy
back the put – most likely at a loss.
Now
on to today’s idea.
Ticker
MGM
Like
the cruise line industry, the hotel and gaming industry is getting crushed by
the impact of the coronavirus. Nobody
knows what the full impact will be and the reality is that things are likely to
get worse before they get better. But as
I have said in the past, opportunity is where you find it.
Figure
1 displays the sharp decline in MGM stock AND the massive spike in implied
volatility.
So
far, MGM has tanked a full -70% since January 17, including an almost
unbelievable -33.6% decline in one day on 3/16/20.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Under no circumstances would I consider buying shares of MGM stock at this point in time. That would be a classic potential case of trying to “catch a falling safe”. Trying to “pick a bottom” in this type of decline is simply foolhardy. But that is NOT what selling a cash secured put in this case is all about.
The
example trade we will consider for MGM involves:
*Selling
10 June 3 puts @ $0.55
*This
action takes in $550 worth of premium ($0.55 x 100 shares x 10 puts)
*The
trader needs to have $3,000 in cash in the account to cover the potential
purchase of the 1,000 shares of stock if need be (this can include the $550 of
premium received, so the investor needs to put up another $2,450 in cash)
Figures
2 and 3 display the particulars and the risk curves for this trade.
Note that the implied volatility for this option as this is written is an astronomical 248.5%! In the prior four years (see the most recent 12 months in Figure 1) the typical range for MGM 90-day option IV was 25%-45%.
Other
things to note:
*There
are 95 days left until option expiration – we are hoping for a significant
decline in IV sometime between now and then
*The
option is trading at $0.55 bid/$0.95 ask.
This is an exceedingly wide bid/ask spread. A trader could use a limit order and try to
get filled at a price above $0.55. For sake of simplicity we are assuming a
fill using a market order at the bid.
*MGM
(as this is written) is trading at $10.25 a share. The breakeven price for this position is
$2.45, another -76% below the current price.
The
possible outcomes:
*If MGM completely collapses, we could end up buying 1,000 shares at $3.00 apiece. But remember, since we took in $0.55 for each option, we sold our effective buy price is $2.45 a share ($3.00 – $0.55 = $2.45)
*Worst case scenario, MGM goes bankrupt, the shares go to $0 and we lose the full $2,450 at risk
*The most likely outcome (hopefully) is that, either:
a) in 95 days, MGM is still above $3 a share the options expire worthless and we keep the $550 in premium. This works out to a 22.5% return ($550 return / $2,450 cash held to secure the put options) in just 95 calendar days
b)
Somewhere along the way implied volatility – and thus the price of the option –
plummets, and we can buy back the option early and a price below $0.55 per
option.
The
bottom line? If MGM does ANYTHING better
than collapsing another 76% in 3 months this trade stands to make a decent
return.
Now
comes the real question: Is this actually a good idea? As with the previous examples, that’s not for
me to say.
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
Back in November 2019, I wrote this article regarding ticker SLV – an ETF that tracks the price of silver bullion. The idea was to enter a very low dollar cost position in case something “big” happened in silver. The expectation at the time – in all honesty – was that silver might “explode” higher prior to January 2021.
Well,
the bad news is that things did not work out that way.
The good news is that that turned out to be OK, and now would probably be a time to consider taking a profit.
The
Original Position
*Figures
1 and 2 display the original position, which involved buying a far out of the
money call and put and selling and even further out of the money call.
*The
total dollar risk on a 1-lot was $56
*The
position had the potential to make a lot of money if silver rallied or declined
sharply, and/or if (spoiler alert) implied volatility soared somewhere along
the way
As
you can see, thanks to the plunge in price and the spike in volatility, this hypothetical
position would be sitting with a profit of +337%.
There
are many ways that a trade with a profit like this could be adjusted to “lock
in a profit and let the rest ride”. However,
volatility spikes tend not to last forever, so this would be a reasonable place
for a trader holding this position to “take the money and run.”
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
To help you decide if you want to go ahead and read this article, take the following short quiz:
Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL) is presently trading at $17.58 (FYI, this article was written on Saturday 3/14/20, by the time you read this, stock and option prices may be very different):
Question #1: Do you think CCL will be trading above $2.25 a share 3 weeks from now?
Question #2: Would you like to make 11.1% in 3 weeks?
If you answered “Yes”, (or at least “Maybe”) to the first two questions, then please continue reading:
In this article, I highlighted one way to potentially take advantage of high volatility in cruise line stocks. That article focused on selling a very long-term put option (expiring in January 2021) for ticker RCL with the expectation (hope?) that implied volatility would at some point plummet and allow an early profit to be taken. The alternative was to buy 100 shares of stock at an effective price of $12.70 (the stock was trading at $32.75 at the time).
In
this article we will look at something shorter-term.
A
Cash Secured Put on Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL)
Figure
1 displays the price action for CCL along with the implied volatility for
shorter-term options.
For
CCL we will use the following example trade (remember, these are NOT
recommendations, only examples).
*CCL
stock is trading at $17.58 a share
*We
will sell 10 April03 2.5 puts at the bid price of $0.25 per option
*These
options expire in 21 days
Here
are how the numbers work out:
*We
need to have cash on hand sufficient to buy 1,000 shares (10 puts x 100 shares
each) of CCL. This comes to $2,500
($2.50 strike price x 10 puts x 100 shares each = $2,500)
*For
selling the 10 puts we take in $250 in premium (short 10 puts at $0.25 x 100
shares per put = $250)
*As
a result, our actual risk is $2,250 ($2,500 cash to secure the puts minus $250
in premium received)
Figure
2 and 3 show the particulars and risk curves
*If CCL completely collapses: we could end up buying 1,000 shares at $2.50 apiece. But remember, since we took in $0.25 for each option, we sold our effective buy price is $2.25 a share ($2.50 – $0.25 = $2.25)
*Worst case scenario: CCL goes bankrupt, the shares go to $0 and we lose the full $2,250 at risk
*The most likely outcome: (hopefully) is that in 21 days the options expire worthless and we keep the $250 in premium. This works out to a 11.1% return ($250 return / $2,250 cash held to secure the put options) in just 21 calendar days.
In
other words, if CCL does ANYTHING better than collapsing another 86% in 3 weeks
this trade makes a decent return.
Summary
The cruise line industry is about to experience a world of hurt. The astronomical level of implied volatility tells us that there is great uncertainty about just how bad things are going to get. At the same time, however, implied volatility tells us that option time premiums are at extreme levels.
Lower cruise line stock prices seem to be a foregone conclusion, and I for one would not be outright buying shares and trying to pick a bottom here. But that’s NOT what the example trade above attempts to do. The fundamental question with it is “do you think CCL will NOT collapse another 86% in the next three weeks – and are you willing to risk $2,250 on that opinion?” Nothing more, nothing less.
It is simply an example of one “potential” way to use options to your advantage.
From
a real-world trading point of view, one thing to pay attention to is bid/ask
levels. For anyone deciding to try to trade these options, limit orders may be essential
to getting a decent fill.
But
as always, the keys to trading success are:
*Spotting
opportunity
*Finding
the optimum way to take advantage of said opportunity
High
implied volatility has created potential opportunity. The example trade highlighted stands to make
10%+ as long as CCL stock does not collapse into the abyss in the next three
weeks.
Is
this actually a good idea? That’s not
for me to say.
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. International investments are subject to
additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political instability and the
potential for illiquid markets. Past
performance is no guarantee of future results.
There is risk of loss in all trading.
Back tested performance does not represent actual performance and should
not be interpreted as an indication of such performance. Also, back tested performance results have
certain inherent limitations and differs from actual performance because it is
achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
With coronavirus now deemed a worldwide pandemic, it is not surprising that the stock prices for cruise ship lines have collapsed. This article does NOT contain a “recommendation”, but only seeks to detail one potential way to play this particular situation.
For the record, possibly the wisest course of action is to stay away from cruise stocks (and cruise ships for that matter, but I digress). But in every situation, there is opportunity. Recently I posted this article suggested that the average option buyer should tread lightly, due to the fact the option implied volatility has exploded in recent weeks, vastly inflating the amount of time premium – and thus the price of, options in general. This makes them “expensive” to buy.
It
can also make them very lucrative to sell.
Like I said, in every situation there is opportunity.
Selling
a Cash Secured Put
Let’s
look at an example using Royal Caribbean (RCL). The strategy is called a “cash secured put”.
In simple terms:
*You
sell an out-of-the-money put option (i.e., one with a strike price below the stock’s
price)
*You
also make sure that you have enough cash in your account to buy 100 shares of
stock at the strike price
Then
you wait and one of several things happens:
*The stock is above the option strike price at option expiration and you keep the premium you received when you sold the option
*The stock is below the option strike price at option expiration and you buy the stock at the strike price, but still keep the premium you received when you sold the option – which serves to reduce the effective purchase price of the shares
*You buy back the put option prior to option expiration (usually done if the option can be bought back at a cheaper price than the price it was originally sold)
The
idea time to do this is when:
*You
are looking at a relatively low-priced stock (so you don’t have to tie up as
much cash as you would with a very high-priced stock)
*Implied
option volatility is extremely high (because that is when the most premium is
available)
Figure 1 displays RCL stock price and 90+-day option implied volatility (black line) four about 4 years.
The historical range is roughly 30% to 40% – now > 150%!
Figure 1 – RCL price and implied volatility (High IV makes options “expensive”) (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)
*Implied volatility is at potentially a once in a lifetime level (i.e., RCL options are “expensive”)
The
problem with just buying RCL stock right here is that no one knows “how low is
low”. So, we will go a different route,
but first a little more pesky “options education.”
A
Quick Lesson in The Effect of Changes in Volatility on Time Premium
*Longer-term
options have more time premium built into their price than shorter-term
options. This is simply because an
option writer is going to demand more premium to write (and be exposed to the
risk of being short an option) a longer-term option than a shorter-term option.
*The
option Greek “Vega” tells us how much time premium (in dollars) an option (or
combined position) will gain or lose if implied volatility rises one full
percentage point. More on this in a
moment.
*Longer-term options have a higher Vega than shorter term options, and their prices will swing more based on changes in IV that shorter-term options.
An
RCL Hypothetical Position
*Just
a reminder, I am not “recommending” this trade, just using it as an interesting
(well, OK if you are an option geek like me) example.
*For
our trade we are going to sell (or sell short, or “write”) the January 2021
22.5 strike price put option.
*This
option is trading at an implied volatility (IV) of 140.2% (glance again at
Figures 1 and 2 to note the historical range for RCL IV)
*This
option does not expire until January 15, 2021, or 309 days from now
*This option has a “Vega” of -$7.09 (this means that IV rises one full percentage point this position will lose roughly -$7.09 and if IV FALLS one full percentage point this position will gain roughly $7.09. In other words, a decline in volatility will work in our favor)
*This
option has a “Theta” of $1.82 (this means that we will gain roughly $1.82 per
day due to time decay, i.e., the time premium for the option will decline by
that amount per day)
*As
this is written, RCL is trading at $30.27 a share
*We
are going to assume that a limit order is used as that we get filled at the
midpoint of the bid/ask range, and sell the put option at $9.80, thereby taking
in $980 in premium
*Since
we are selling a 22.5 strike price put, it means we need to have $2,250 (22.5 x
100 shares) in cash in our trading account to cover the potential cost of
buying the shares
*However,
this cost is reduced by the fact that we received $980 in premium for writing
the option.
*This
means that – in theory – if RCL is trading below $22.50 a share (or 25.7% below
the current stock price) on January 15, 2021, we would be required to buy 100
shares of RCL at $22.50 a share. Again,
however, because we received the premium, our effective purchase price would be:
Option
Strike Price = 22.5 x 100 = $2,250
Minus
the option premium received = $9.80
Net
Cost = $12.70 a share or $1,270 for 100 shares
Figure
4 displays the risk curves for this position, and you can see the breakeven
price of $12.70 a share.
Figure
4 – RCL short put risk curves
Two
Other Possibilities
The big potential negative to note is this: If RCL is under the strike price at option expiration you must buy the shares at $22.50. Even if RCL fell to $1 a share you still need to buy the shares at $22.50 (although again, your net cost is $12.70). $12.70 looks pretty good when the stock is trading at $30.27 a share. But the key risk factor to note in this trade is that YES, you can lose money if the stock keeps falling.
For the record, in the worst case scenario, RCL goes bankrupt and the trader loses the entire $2,250.
The
other possibility is to buy back the put option before it expires. This is once again where implied volatility
becomes an important factor. Let’s
suppose the following:
*At
some point the RCL stock price decline “levels off”, i.e., it stops plunging
for awhile
*When
that happens, chances are great that implied volatility will decline. In this case – refer back to Figures 1 and 2 –
implied volatility can fall a very long way
Now remember our discussion earlier (or better yet refer to the discussion in this article) about changes in IV. This position has a Vega of -$7.09, which means that it will lose a lot of time premium if IV falls.
(TECHNICAL NOTE: Greek values change from day to day as time passes and the price of the stock and the option fluctuate)
Example
of Buying Back the Put Option Early
For
example’s sake, let’s assume:
*Two
months’ go by
*RCL
stock price is unchanged
*IV
falls from 140% to 40%
Because
of time decay and the sharp decline in IV, a large portion of the current time
premium will evaporate. This could give
us the opportunity to buy back the put option at a profit and close the trade,
rather than waiting around for January 2021.
Figure
5 – The effect of IV falling from 140% back to 40% (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)
Figure 6 – RCL risk curves two months later assuming IV falls
to 40% (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)
Summary
Opportunity is where you find it. But everything entails risk. The example trade presented here has the potential to take advantage of the current levels of fear surrounding RCL stock by selling a far out of the money put option and ultimately either buying it back early at a profit or buying shares of RCL at $12.70 a share.
But
remember, if RCL drops below that price, large losses can still occur
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are based
on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
The
reality is that there are many terrific opportunities available to option
traders at the moment. Unfortunately,
there are mostly NOT the kind that the majority of individual traders are used
to – or should necessarily be pursuing.
There
are two areas of concern:
*Astronomically
high implied volatility (more on this in a moment)
*Excessively
large bid/ask spreads
A
quick and dirty way to understand implied volatility:
*An
option trading “in-the-money” its price is comprised of “intrinsic value” (i.e.,
the amount be which it is in-the-money) and “extrinsic value”, more commonly
known as “time premium.”
*An
option trading “out-of-the-money is comprised solely of time premium.
*Think
of time premium as the amount that the option buyer pays the option write in
order to induce the option writer to assume the risk of selling the option in
the first place.
*The
best analogy is the “insurance premium” one. You pay a premium to an insurance
company in order to induce them to write you an insurance policy. Likewise, you pay (time) premium to an option
writer in order to induce them to write an option that you can buy.
*Now
let’s look at it from the perspective of the option writer. If the market is calm and quiet and there
just isn’t much going on you will still demand a certain price from the option
buyer before you will assume the risk of writing an option.
*OK,
now if the market and/or the specific security you are trading is wildly
volatile with large price swings, are you going to demand more time premium or
less in order to assume the risk of writing an option? The question answers itself.
*So,
when things get crazy – and as demand from panicked option buyers increases,
option premiums can increase significantly.
The way to identify whether this volatility is high, low or somewhere in
between is to look at the implied volatility for the options on that stock.
*If
IV is exceedingly low that means that options are “cheap”, i.e., time premiums
are low (this can be a good time to buy premium)
*If
IV is exceedingly high that means that options are “expensive”, i.e., time
premiums are high (this can be a good time to sell premium for traders who are
so inclined)
IMPORTANT
POINT: If you are thinking that because of the
large price movements that you will buy a call or put option and making a
killing – well, you may be able to if the underlying security moves far enough
in price, BUT:
*You
will be paying an extremely high price for the privilege of buying that option
(repeating now, if implied volatility is extremely high – which it is – you will
be paying a lot of time premium)
*In
addition, if IV subsides while you hold that long call or put, time premium may
collapse, thereby sharply decreasing the value of your option.
To
put things in perspective, the IV for options on ticker SPY (an ETF that tracks
the S&P 500 Index) over roughly four years is displayed as the black line
in Figure 1.
Figure 1 – SPY with Implied Volatility (IV) “to the moon” (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)
Figure 2 zooms in on the most recent 120 days in Figure 1.
Notice
the huge spike in IV – the black line?
This is your warning that time premium levels are “crazy” high. Let’s look at what this means to a
trader.
Let’s
say you expect SPY to resume its recent decline, between now and May options expiration. You might buy the May 288 put @ $20.11 (cost
– $2,011). The current IV for this option is 41.26. See Figure 3.
Note
the change to the price of the put option:
It fell from $20.11 to just $8.63!
This is typically referred to as a “volatility crush.”
This
is with NO CHANGE IN PRICE – SPY is at the same price it was 2 weeks ago, and
yet solely because the market – and investor’s fears – have “calmed down”, this
option – in theory – could lose -57% in value.
IMPORTANT
POINT:
None
of this means that you cannot make money by buying a put option (for the
record, if SPY fell 10% in price in two weeks with no change in IV, the May 288
put would be worth roughly $34 per contract, a 69% gain). But here is the point:
*Long-term
success in option trading comes from putting the odds as much on your side as
possible on a trade-by-trade basis.
*Buying options when implied volatility levels are at extremely high levels DOES NOT constitute putting the odds on your side.
If you are a trader who typically just buys calls and puts, you might consider either scaling back a bit – or um, self-quarantining completely – for a little while until IV’s come back to earth.
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
Fighting
fear is one of the most difficult tests we humans face. Whether it is corona virus, a plunging stock
market, [Your most hated presidential candidate here] occupying the White House
in January 2021, or one of countess other things, it is pretty easy to find
things to be afraid of. Maybe it is just
a perception but for whatever reason, it seems that society today is less able
to handle their collective fears. I saw
it aptly put this way somewhere:
1941:
“We have nothing to fear, but fear itself”
2020:
“AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH”
Maybe
that’s not entirely accurate. But it
sort of feels like it at the moment.
For
the purposes of this blog, let’s stick to the financial markets.
The
bond market:
*If
you are holding bonds at the moment you are doing great – particularly if you
are holding long-term bonds. With
Central Banks pushing interest rates down, yields are plunging and bonds are
soaring.
*But
“chasing things” that are moving abnormally well is typically not an investors
best move. What is happening at this
moment in long-term treasuries is very abnormal and I would be hesitant to
chase that move right here.
Figure
1 – Long-term treasuries appear to have achieved “Lift Off” – Be careful here
(Courtesy: www.BarChart.com)
*Given that the financial markets are likely to remain volatile for some time, I personally still tend to migrate to intermediate-term bonds due to their much lower volatility relative to long-term treasuries.
The
U.S. Dollar:
*Just a reminder that support and resistance levels can be very useful in identifying opportunities – as well as risks. In this article and this article back in 2019 I noted that the U.S. Dollar was running into some serious resistance. I make no claim to have “called the top” (because I never do) but it did appear to be an area of high risk for the dollar.
Figure
2 – The U.S. Dollar (Courtesy: www.BarChart.com)
The
stock market:
*Fear
is rampant as I write, with all of the major averages plunging and the VIX
Index “spiking” higher again.
*Ignore
the headlines and watch the previous lows!
While the VIX Index is soaring to a new high for this move, the major
indexes have yet to take out their lows from last week.
*I
am certainly not going to say that it won’t happen. The most likely outcome is continued
volatility for a while with almost certainly a test of th recent low and/or
even lower lows before the ultimate bottom.
*My
point is simply that if you look at the headlines today you will get that “Armageddon
Feeling”, despite the fact that – technically speaking – the market is still
higher than it was during the end of February plunge.
*Repeating
– watch the market and NOT the news!
Figure
3 – VIX Index is soaring…. (Courtesy: www.BarChart.com)
Figure
4 – …but watch the previous lows on SPX (Courtesy: www.BarChart.com)
Energy
Stocks:
*My
gut still tells me that we are in an area of great opportunity for buying energy
stocks.
*HOWEVER, buying in when prices plunging to new lows is not my style. Still, I am paying close attention.
*Reason 1: In this article there is a discussion arguing that the age of fossil fuels – for better or worse – is NOT going to end anytime soon
*Reason
2: Energy stocks are universally loathed as evidenced by the sentiment chart in
Figure 5 from www.sentimentrader.com
*Reason
3: We are in a period that on a seasonal basis is typically favorable for
energy stocks. It may or may not work
this time, but the point is that given the current oversold status, the extremely
negative sentiment and the time of year, if energy stocks turn it could happen
very quickly. So keep an eye open.
*Regarding
pandemics and stock markets, adopt a “hope for the best, prepare for the worst
mentality”
*If
you believe you are overexposed in the market then make a plan for when and
what and how much you should sell. Then
follow your plan and DO NOT look back in regret
*If
you want to put your head in the sand and just hold on forever, fight that urge
(the time will come to NOT “ride it out”)
*If
you have cash to invest – don’t try to be a hero, but don’t be a total wimp
either
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
In Part I and Part II I laid out my own personal expectation that a bear market of some significance may well occur between the end of 2019 and the middle of 2022. Then of course, it all seemed to happen in a week. Now the reality is that I certainly did not “call the top”. In the articles linked above I identified the “current trend of the market” as “bullish”, which was technically correct.
Let
explain my own personal “Big Picture, incredibly rudimentary” method for
designating the current trend of the stock market as bullish or bearish. In no particular order:
*Was
last month’s closing price for the S&P 500 Index above its 10-month moving
average? (As of 2/28/2020 = NO)
*Are at least 2 of the following indexes – Dow Industrials, S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000 – above their respective 200-day moving averages? (As of 9:40 CST on 3/4/2020 = YES, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100)
*Is
the current month November through May? (YES)
*As explained in this article, has the S&P 500 Index NOT gone 3 months without making a new high, then taken out the low of the intervening 3 months? (YES)
If:
*3
or 4 of these are bullish, then I am bullish
*2
are bullish, I typically give the bullish case the benefit of the doubt
*If
only 1 is bullish I raise some cash
*If 0 are bullish we are in a bear market and I play some serious defense
As I write, 3 of the 4 still qualify as “bullish” (the S&P 500 Index did close February below its 10-month average, so that one is now bearish), so – despite the hysterics of the last week of February – I have no choice but to call myself “bullish.”
Also, on the plus side, a ton of market indicators reached vastly oversold levels during the selloff (see here for one example). This in no way guarantees a rebound nor an immediate resumption of the uptrend, but it is a hopeful sign.
If
history is a guide:
*We
will likely see a lot of volatility in the weeks ahead – big up days and
optimistic headlines, followed by another plunge and more apocalyptic prognostications
*The
market should work itself higher in the months ahead following the massive
oversold readings I just mentioned
So, the good news is that long-term investors may be OK just sitting tight for now. The bad news is that I still think there is more potential trouble waiting “down the road.” And I urge investors to be vigilant and NOT to adopt the “I am just going to ride it out no matter what” mentality.
What
to Do Now
Its probably OK to “exhale” a little bit after last week, but DO NOT get complacent.
Keep an eye on the four trend-following indicators I mentioned above. If and when the market truly starts to “roll over” it will – in my opinion – absolutely, positively be time to “play some defense”.
A
little more on why I remain vigilant (much of which is detailed here and here):
*Valuation
levels remain high – which means there is still plenty of downside risk
*The decennial “Early Lull” remains a concern (the first 2.5 years of decades starting with a presidential election have seen the Dow lose ground 6 times in row, with an average loss in the -14% range)
*While I think Coronavirus fear is insanely overhyped, it is too soon to say for sure that it won’t have a significant impact on the worldwide economy
*Lastly,
one thing I have not mentioned before is the dearth of available cash. See Figures 1 and 2 from www.sentmentrader.com
These numbers may have jumped a little bit during the recent selloff, but not likely substantially so. Bottom line: there is not a ton of “buying power” sitting around to propel the stock market indefinitely higher.
Summary
Repeating
from previous articles:
*Keep
your head screwed on straight
*Regarding
pandemics and stock markets, adopt a “hope for the best, prepare for the worst
mentality”
*If
you believe you are overexposed in the market then make a plan for when and
what and how much you should sell. Then
follow your plan and DO NOT look back in regret
*If
you want to put your head in the sand and just hold on forever, fight that urge
(the time will come to NOT “ride it out”)
*If
you have cash to invest – don’t try to be a hero, but don’t be a total wimp
either
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
I am not great with predictions, but I am 100% confident that the title of this piece will prove entirely accurate. Now how many of us will actually die from contracting Coronavirus remains to be seen. I am hoping it will be far less than we are being led to believe (Yes, I am a bit incensed about the fact that whatever the ultimate number ends up being, the media will do everything in their power to make it seem 1,000 times worse).
Like everyone else, I have to battle to keep emotions in check. And repeating what I said here, do whatever it is you think you need to do in terms of surviving what we are told is an “inevitable” pandemic. Stock up on food, water, supplies, masks, whatever.
When it comes to investing however….. I argued here and here that a bear market is likely between 12/31/2019 and 6/30/2022. In the here and now, things appear to be getting a bit overdone.
Getting
to Oversold
I
follow a version of the McClellan Oscillator using NASDAQ advances and declines
instead of the NYSE. In simple terms,
the MO measures the difference between the 19-day exponential average and the
39-day exponential average of daily advances minus declines. Extreme low readings indicate an “oversold”
market – which can often be seen as a buying opportunity.
One
extreme level that I look for is a daily MO reading of -300 or less. This level was pierced as of the close on
2/27/2020. Figure 1 displays the Nasdaq
Composite Index since 1988 with the McClellan Oscillator below it. As you can see, readings below -300 are
fairly rare.
Figure
1 – Nasdaq Composite Index with Nasdaq McClellan Oscillator (1988-2020)
To
get a better picture, Figure 2 displays the worst decline – using closing
prices – experienced in the six months following each previous -300 MO
reading. In other words, “How much worse
did it get, after the first sign of an oversold situation?”
Figure
2 – Worst Nasdaq 100 declines in 6 months average McClellan Oscillator < -300
In 8 of the 9 cases, the maximum close to close decline from the first “oversold” reading was -6.5% or less. The exception of course was 2008, when the market plunged another 18+% before bottoming out.
The charts that follow displays the Nasdaq 100 Index during the six months after the 1st MO -300 reading
*Regarding
pandemics and stock markets, adopt a “hope for the best, prepare for the worst
mentality”
*If
you believe you are overexposed in the market then make a plan for when and
what and how much you should sell. Then
follow your plan and DO NOT look back in regret
*If
you want to put your head in the sand and just hold on forever, fight that urge
(again I refer you to the articles linked above)
*If
you have cash to invest – don’t try to be a hero, but don’t be a total wimp
either
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.
The problem with situations like the current one – besides the angst and real-life implications of having your net worth decrease quickly – is that people tend to get wrapped up in tangential issues. Turn on the cable news and you will likely here breathless speculation about how seriously the coronoavirus will impact the U.S. – and the world – both in terms of how many people may die in the shorter term and how badly the economy might tank as everyone hides in their homes in the longer run.
Blah,
blah, blah.
Looks
folks, do whatever it is you think you need to do in terms of surviving what we
are told is an “inevitable” pandemic. Stock up on food, water, supplies, masks, whatever. But this is an investment blog. So, let’s get down to the only question that
really matters right now for investors: “What to do now.”
And the answers depends on the following: Are you fully invested or do you have cash to invest?
If
You Are Fully Invested
While the ferocity of the decline is quite unsettling, the reality is that this market has been overdue for “a whack.” During the rally in the last year, cash levels fell substantially, confidence rose significantly, volatility fell to barely a beep, and the number of investors adopting the “I should just put all my money in an index fund and forget about it” approach seemed to accelerate (speaking anecdotally on that last point). So not really a surprise that the market would “shake the trees.”
Just
to put the current decline in perspective, please take a quick glance at the
monthly chart of the S&P 500 Index in Figure 1.
Figure
1 – S&P 500 Index Monthly (1971-present)
If
you are fully invested, you have 3 basic choices:
*Sell everything – While I cannot predict what will happen next, I will just mention that dumping your entire portfolio in a panic on the sixth consecutive day of a decline just sounds like one of those things you may well look back on with regret. If you are contemplating this approach (and even if you are not) please read this article, this article and this article regarding how long-term tops typically form.
*Sell some – While the comment about doing so this well into a panic selling decline applies here also, the reality is that if you are completely uncomfortable with your exposure to the stock market, there is nothing wrong with “playing defense” – as long as you understand that doing so may cost you in the long run. If you sell – and I am just making up a number here – 25% of your portfolio you can say, “OK, I have less exposure if things get worse and I have some cash I can put to work at lower levels if that is the case.” Fine. Just remember that if the market does turn back up you may end up kicking yourself somewhere down the road.
*Hold On – Buying and holding forever with 100% of your capital is not my favorite strategy. Please take a moment to review Figures 3 and 4 in this article. There is a time to “play defense.” When the Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 and Russell 2000 all drop below their 200-day moving averages (the Dow and Russell already have) and especially if those averages start to roll over the risk of a significant bear market increases significantly. But once again please read this article, this article and this article to get a little “non panic induced” historical perspective.
If
You Have Cash
If
you have cash to invest, then situations like this can prove to be a buying
opportunity. Unfortunately, they can
also prove to be a “trying to catch a falling safe” opportunity (Sorry, I don’t
make the rules). So, I suggest one of
two approaches:
*Be
patient and wait for, a) a reflex rally, b) another decline, and c) a reversal
back to the upside – especially if it involves anything resembling a double bottom.
*Put some cash to work now (or at least soon) and hold back some for another opportunity later.
Totally
off the beaten path comment: For
the record I have not “taken the plunge” yet and am NOT “recommending” that you
do, but my gut says that now (or at least soon) is going to be a terrific
buying opportunity for the loathed, hated and utterly bombed out energy sector
(my favorite is HAL unless and until it takes out it recent low of $16.97 a
share).
Summary
*Keep
your head screwed on straight
*Regarding pandemics and stock markets, adopt a “hope for the best, prepare for the worst” mentality
*If
you believe you are overexposed in the market then make a plan for when and
what and how much you should sell. Then
follow your plan and DO NOT look back in regret
*If
you want to put your head in the sand and just hold on forever, fight that urge
(again I refer you to the articles linked above)
*If you have cash to invest – don’t try to be a hero, but don’t be a total wimp either
Um, have a nice day(?)
Jay
Kaeppel
Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas
expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and are
based on research conducted and presented solely by the author. The information presented does not represent
the views of the author only and does not constitute a complete description of
any investment service. In addition,
nothing presented herein should be construed as investment advice, as an
advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or as an offer to
sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party
sources. While the data is believed to
be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty
or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such
information. International investments
are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political
instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results. There is risk of loss in all
trading. Back tested performance does
not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication
of such performance. Also, back tested
performance results have certain inherent limitations and differs from actual
performance because it is achieved with the benefit of hindsight.