Monthly Archives: April 2017

The Good and Bad in May

April 28, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

The beginning of the month of May and the end of the month of May into early June have overall been a decent time to be in the stock market. The middle of May, typically not so much.

This article is an update from this article written almost a year ago.

The “Proper Outlook” for May

For our purposes we will split May (into June) into three segments:

*Segment 1 (Bullish): The first 3 trading days of May

*Segment (Bearish): May trading days #4 through #16

*Segment 3 (Bullish): May trading day #17 through the 5th trading day of June

For 2017:

*Segment 1 extends from the close on 4/28/17 through the close on 5/3/17

*Segment 2 extends from the close on 5/3/17 through the close on 5/22/17

*Segment 3 extends from the close on 5/22/17 through the close on 6/7/17

In 2016:

*Segments 1 and 3 combined to gain +1.8%

*Segment 2 lost (-0.9%)

From 1934 through 2016

*Segments 1 and 3 combined to gain +160.5%

*Segment 2 lost (-51.5%)

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in Dow Jones Industrials Average during May/June Bullish Segments 1 and 3 (blue line) versus Bearish Segment 2 (red line); 1934-2017

Segments 1 and 3 combined:

*showed a gain 54 times (65%)

*showed a loss 29 times (35%)

*Average gain = +2.9%

*Average loss = (-2.0%)

*Median return all years = +0.88%

Segment 2:

*showed a gain 40 times (48%)

*showed a loss 43 times (52%)

*Average gain = +2.0%

*Average loss = (-3.4%)

*Median return all years = (-0.07%)

Summary

So is the beginning and end of May (plus the beginning of June) sure to see stock market gains? Not necessarily. Likewise, is the middle of May guaranteed to be a downer? Again, not necessarily.

But history suggests that that is the way to bet.

Jay Kaeppel

Disclaimer: The data presented herein were obtained from various third-party sources. While I believe the data to be reliable, no representation is made as to, and no responsibility, warranty or liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of such information. The information, opinions and ideas expressed herein are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice, an advertisement or offering of investment advisory services, or an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

A Really (Really) Long-Term Perspective on Interest Rates

April 27, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

The support and resistance levels and the trends (or lack thereof) that a trader sees on a chart can vary greatly depending on the time period covered in the chart. In other words, a 1-minute bar chart can be extremely useful to a very short-term trader, but will present a very different perspective than say a weekly chart for the same security. The point is simply that there is no one best timeframe for anything.

That being said, sometimes when you are simply trying to gain “perspective”, a really long-term approach can be useful. To wit, consider 10-year treasury bonds. Using the data found at this link: (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IRLTLT01USM156N)

I added a 125-month exponential moving average (calculations below) to gain a very long-term perspective regarding interest rate trends and their current state. Remember that this is not a “timing system” but rather more of a “confirmation system” that will never pick a top or bottom but (as we will see) can be useful in identifying the overall long-term trend in 10-year treasury bond yields.

Calculations for the 125-month exponential moving average (EMA)

*Multiplier2 = 2 / (moving average length + 1)

*Multiplier 1 = (1 – Multiplier2)

*Calculation1 = (Previous Moving Average * Multiplier1)

*Calculation2 = (Current Monthly Yield * Multiplier2)

*New Moving Average = Calculation1 + Calculation2

Are we having fun yet?

For example, for data point 03-01-2017:

*Multiplier2 = 2 / (125 + 1) = 0.0159

*Multiplier 1 = (1 – Multiplier2) = 0.9841

*Calculation1 = (Previous Moving Average * Multiplier1) = (2.8424 * 0.9841) = 2.7973

*Calculation2=(Current Monthly Yield * Multiplier2)=(2.48 * 0.0159) =0.0394

*New Moving Average=Calculation1+Calculation2=2.7973 + 0.0394 = 2.8367

So the latest data point is 2.48% and the latest 125-month EMA is 2.8367%

Long-Term Trend-Following Rules:

*If the latest monthly yield value is BELOW the New Moving Average then 10-Year bond yields are considered to be in a downtrend, i.e., Bonds are BULLISH

*If the latest monthly yield value is ABOVE the New Moving Average then 10-Year bond yields are considered to be in an uptrend, i.e., Bonds are BEARISH

Figure 1 below displays the long-term chart

Figure 1 – 10-Year Treasury Yields (blue line) with 125-month exponential moving average (red line); 1960-2017

According to this method, 10-year bonds were:

*Bullish starting on 1/1/1960 with yields at 4.72%

*Bearish starting on 9/1/1965 with yields at 4.29%

*Bullish starting on 6/1/1985 with yields at 10.16%

As of the latest data point (3-01-2017) the 10-year yield was 2.48% and the 125-month EMA was at 2.8367%. Since the current data point is still below the moving average the trend in rates is still considered “down”, therefore there still is no bearish reversal confirmation from this particular indicator.

When the 10-year yield finally rises back above the 125-month EMA it will (likely) confirm a reversal in fortune for bonds back to the bearish side.

Summary

My own primary 30-year bond trend method has been bearish on 20-year bonds since 6/10/2016 (as I last highlight here).

Still, a true reversal in the trend of interest rates will not (at least in my market-addled mind) be confirmed until the 10-year yield moves back above its 125-month EMA.

Jay Kaeppel

More on Months to Beware of in 2017

April 25, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

I am in a good mood today (don’t worry, I am sure I’ll get over it) so I am going to make it easy for the people with short attention spans: August, September and October. That is the answer to the title above. If you would like just a little more information please keep reading.

This is essentially a followup to this previous article.

First off, please note that the title says “Months to Beware of” and NOT “Months that are absolutely, positively guaranteed to witness stock market Armageddon!” Here it is in a nutshell:

In terms of the election cycle we are in a post-election year. Figure 1 displays the cumulative growth of $1,000 invested in the Dow since 1900 ONLY during August through October of Post-Election years.Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in Dow Industrial August through October during Post-Election Years

In terms of the decennial pattern we are in Year 7 of the current decade. Figure 2 displays the cumulative growth of $1,000 invested in the Dow since 1900 ONLY during August through October of Years ending in “7”. Note that 2007 was the first “7” year to actually show a August through October gain.

Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested in Dow Industrial August through October during Years ending in “7”

Figure 3 displays the cumulative growth of $1,000 invested in the Dow since 1900 ONLY during August through October during all Post-Election and/or Years ending in “7”.Figure 3 – Growth of $1,000 invested in Dow Industrial August through October during Post-Election Years and/or Years ending in “7”

As you can see the long-term cumulative results are pretty awful. That’s the Bad News and the reason caution may be in order during August through October of this year. But the Good News is that the results are not “uniformly awful.”

Figure 4 below list the year-by-year results for all relevant years. But in sum there are have 35 years that were either Post-Election, ending in “7”, or both:

* # times showing a gain = 15 (43% of the time)

* # of times showing a loss = 20 (57% of the time)

* Average gain = +5.7%

* Average loss = (-9.9%)

In sum, while the results in Figure 3 appear to be pretty unrelentingly bad, the reality is that reality is that 43% of the years that appear in Figure 4 below actually showed a gain.

So the watchword as we get closer to August will be “Caution” and not “Fear” nor “Panic”.

Year	Type	Aug-Oct % +(-)
1901	Post-Election	(10.0)
1905	Post-Election	2.5
1907	Year 7	(26.8)
1909	Post-Election	2.4
1913	Post-Election	(0.2)
1917	Both	(18.8)
1921	Post-Election	6.3
1925	Post-Election	17.0
1927	Year 7	(0.5)
1929	Post-Election	(21.3)
1933	Post-Election	(2.9)
1937	Both	(25.6)
1941	Post-Election	(8.5)
1945	Post-Election	14.6
1947	Year 7	(0.7)
1949	Post-Election	7.7
1953	Post-Election	0.2
1957	Both	(13.3)
1961	Post-Election	(0.2)
1965	Post-Election	9.0
1967	Year 7	(2.7)
1969	Post-Election	5.0
1973	Post-Election	3.3
1977	Both	(8.1)
1981	Post-Election	(10.5)
1985	Post-Election	2.0
1987	Year 7	(22.5)
1989	Post-Election	(0.6)
1993	Post-Election	4.0
1997	Both	(9.5)
2001	Post-Election	(13.7)
2005	Post-Election	(1.9)
2007	Year 7	5.4
2009	Post-Election	5.9
2013	Post-Election	0.3

Figure 4 – Year-by-Year Results for Aug/Sep/Oct during Post-Election years and Years ending in “7”

Jay Kaeppel

How NOT to Hedge a Long-Term Rise in Interest Rates

April 20, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

The fear of rising interest rates is one of the biggest concerns among many investors at the moment. And in light of the fact that interest rates declined for roughly 30+ years and have essentially been moving sideways for roughly 5 years these fears may not be unfounded. But what to do about the prospect for a longer-term rise in rates is an entirely different question.

(See also Post-Election April and May)

People who are expecting higher interest rates in the years ahead may be inclined to think that buying an inverse bond fund might protect them. But the short answer is this:

*Inverse bond funds are for trading purposes only, NOT for buy-and-hold.

Let me put it another way just to be clear:

1) If bond yields rise sharply over a relatively short period of time an inverse bond fund can rise sharply (and in so doing does in fact serve its purpose as a hedge against higher interest rates).

2) If bond yields rise slowly, inverse bond funds will likely lose value over time – albeit with the occasional sharp rally every once in awhile if and when the pace of the rise in yield happens to pick up.

3) If bond yields drift sideways – especially over a longer period of time, inverse bond funds will lose a great deal of value in the process (more on this scenario in a moment).

4) If bond yield move lower over any meaningful period of time, inverse bond funds will lose a surprisingly large amount of value.

The Dangers of Inverse Bonds Funds

Figure 1 displays the 30-year treasury yield in the top clip and ticker TBF (ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF) in the bottom clip. Figure 1 – 30-Year Treasury Yields vs. Inverse Long-Term Treasury Bond ETF (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Note that while the yield on 30-year treasuries has essentially traded sideways since September 2011, ticker TBF has continued to lose significant ground. Since 9/30/11:

*30-year treasury yields have moved from 2.92% to 2.86%

*Ticker TBF has moved from $32.15 to $22.77 (-29.2%)

The bottom line:

*If your timing is excellent and you buy just before a meaningful rise in rates inverse bond funds can make money.

*If rates decline or even simply move sideways, inverse bond funds will lose (likely a significant amount of money).

If you are looking to hedge against a long-term rise in interest rate – look elsewhere.

You have been warned.

Jay Kaeppel

Simple Bond Strategy Soon to Switch

April 12, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

Please note that the title includes the word “Simple” but does NOT include the words “Best”, “Infallible”, “World”, “Beater”, nor “You”, “Can’t” or “Lose”. The strategy discussed was first written about here and the mechanics remain unchanged.

This simple system has three things going for it:

*It’s simple

*It takes advantage of some very persistent seasonal trends

*It has a pretty consistent track record

The System

In general:

*The system (attempts to) take advantage of the typical strength in the stock market from December through April and the typical strength in the bond market from May through November.

*Junk bonds have a higher correlation to the stock market than they do to treasury bonds

*GNMA bonds tend to be less volatile than longer-term treasury bonds

So, the rules are as follows:

*December through April hold VWEHX

*May through November hold VFIIX

VWEHX is the Vanguard High Yield Corporate Bond Fund

VFIIX is the Vanguard GNMA Fund

Figure 1 below displays the growth of $1,000 invested in each fund since 1980 ONLY during the months of December through April (All data in this article is generated using Monthly Total Return Data from PEP database from Callan Associates).Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 in VWEHX (blue) versus VFIIX (red) ONLY during December through April; 7/31/80-3/31/17

*During the months of December through April VWEHX gained +472% versus +127% for VFIIX.

Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in each fund since 1980 ONLY during the month of May through November.Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 in VWEHX (blue) versus VFIIX (red) ONLY during May through November; 7/31/80-3/31/17

*Between the months of May through November VFIIX gained +508% versus +250% for VWEHX.

Figure 3 displays the growth of $1,000 invested using the switching rules detailed earlier versus “splitting” $1,000 between VWEHX and VFIIX and holding both.Figure 3 – Growth of $1,000 invested using “Switch” Strategy versus “Splitting” the money between VWEHX and VFIIX and holding; 7/31/80-3/31/17

Since 11/30/2017:

*VWEHX is up +3.6%

*VFIIX is up +0.3%

More importantly, since July 1980:

*The Switch System has an average 12-month gain of +10.8% with a maximum drawdown of -9.3%.

*The “Split” System has an average 12-month gain of +8.5% with a maximum drawdown of -13.5%

Summary

So is this “World Beater” of all bond trading systems? Hardly. Additionally, with concerns of higher interest rates it is fair to wonder how GNMA bonds will perform during the “seasonally favorable” months of May through November in a rising rate environment.

But this system does meet two criteria of any decent investment or trading method:

*It takes advantage of an “edge” (seasonality in the stock and bond markets)

*It’s simple.

Jay Kaeppel

Speculatively Straddling Silver

April 11, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

The title of this piece sounds like it should be accompanied by the standard “do not try to say this three times fast” warning. In any event, I want to emphasize that what follows is not a “recommendation” but rather an “example” of one unique way to speculate based on a given set of circumstances.

Silver

A glance at a chart of ticker SLV (the ETF that tracks the price of silver bullion) will likely lead different traders to reach different conclusions. In Figure 1 we see “the bearish case”, which suggests that silver has strong resistance overhead and that a decline may be in the offing.Figure 1 – A “bearish” chart for SLV (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

Figure 2 displays an “alternative bullish case” for ticker SLV. In the top and bottom clips respectively we see that the Weekly and Daily Elliott Wave counts (generated using an objective algorithm, for better or worse) are both lined up to the bullish side. This would suggest that a breakout to the upside and a larger rally is impending.Figure 2 – A “bullish” chart for SLV (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

So who’s right and who’s wrong? It beats me? One thing I do know (and which you can see in Figure 3 below) is that the implied volatility for options on ticker SLV is extremely low. For the long-winded technical explanations of implied volatility – all the current low reading really means is that the amount of time premium built into the prices for call and put options on SLV is extremely low, i.e., SLV options are “cheap”.Figure 3 – Implied Volatility for SLV options at a 2-year low (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

So when we combine:

1) A market that appears poised to make a meaningful price move (but the direction is a question mark)

2) Cheap options

Then 3) we have a good setup for an option strategy known as a “straddle”.

SLV Straddle

A “straddle” simply involved buying a call option and a put option at the same strike price for the same security. In this example we will look at:

*Buying 1 SLV June 17 call option @ $0.61

*Buying 1 SLV June 17 put option @ $0.57

Each 1-lot of this straddle will cost $118 ((0.61 + 0.57) x 100). The particulars appear in Figures 4 and 5 below.Figure 4 – June SLV 17 straddle (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Figure 5 – June SLV 17 straddle risk curves (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

Key things to note:

*If this trade is held until June option expiration on 6/16 and SLV closes that day at exactly $17 a share (and wouldn’t that be just my luck?) this trade will lose the entire $118.

*If SLV closes between $15.82 and $18.18 (the breakeven prices) on 6/16 this trade will experience a loss of somewhere between $0 and -$118.

*If SLV is above $18.18 or below $15.82 then the trade will show a profit.

*As you can see by looking at the black line in Figure 4, “time decay” will accelerate in the last 23 days prior to expiration.

*The real hope for this trade is that SLV will make a significant move in either direction sooner than later – i.e., before time decay starts to eat away at the time premium bolt into the option prices – and afford an opportunity to either take a profit (a target might be15% to 20% of the initial cost) or to “adjust” an open profitable trade (see this example) and “let it ride” in hopes of a catching a larger move.

Summary

Is this trade a good idea? I am not actually saying that it is. The only thing I can say is that it is one relatively inexpensive way to speculate on a market that could be poised to make a move. Nothing more, nothing less.

As always, time will tell.

Jay Kaeppel

Uptrend/Downtrend (and Sideways Trend)

April 10, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

Definition of “experience”: Sticking around long enough to pick up a couple of things. In the financial markets, prices go up, prices go down and prices go sideways. This is a universal truth. The trick is figuring out which security is doing what. Let’s take a look across the spectrum.

UP: Ticker PGAL

Now when most people think of “exciting investment opportunities” the country of Portugal is typically not one of the first things to pop into people’s heads. On the other hand, if you say that a given security is “consolidating”, “compressing”, “coiling” and/or “trading in an ever narrower range”, then a lot of people who look at stock charts will sit up and take notice.

In this article I noted the fact that ticker PGAL (an ETF that tracks an index of companies in, yes, Portugal) was doing all of the above on a monthly, weekly and daily bar chart. Sure enough the shares broke out to the upside and now appear to have broken its previous long term downtrend.Figure 1 – Ticker PGAL (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

So is it clear sailing from here? Not necessarily. $10.50 could prove to be a strong resistance area and PGAL could fall back lower in the $8.59 to $10.50 a share range. But the two key takeaways are

1) This could be one to keep an eye – particularly if it can top $10.50 a share.

2) In this case experience teaches us that the “range bound consolidation” is something to always be on the lookout for.

DOWN: Sugar

In this article I highlighted the tendency for the sugar market to experience consistent weakness in the March/April time frame. This year that period extends from the close on 3/13/2017 through the close on 4/17/2017 (NOTE: the original article stated that the end date as 4/14 but that is Good Friday and the markets are closed. So April Trading Day #10 is 4/17). As you can see in Figure 2, July sugar futures have so far declined from 18.21 to 16.72. At $1,120 for each one full point in movement in the futures contract, this represents a profit of $1,669 on each futures contract sold short.

Figure 2 – July Sugar futures (Courtesy ProfitSource by HUBB)

Still, it is important to note that this period does not end until the close on Monday 4/17, so the “jury is still out”. In any event, experience teaches us that persistent seasonal trends can be useful in telling trader “where to look” for a new opportunity.

Sideways: T-Bonds (Ticker TLT)

In this article I noted a bearish setup in t-bonds and highlighted an example option trade on the ETF ticker TLT (that tracks the long-term treasury bond) designed to take advantage of that possibility. TLT subsequently declined from 121.29 to 117.78 a share, generating an open profit on the original option trade.

Then in this article I highlighted an “adjustment” to the original trade designed to lock in a profit while still allowing for further profit potential. Since that time ticker TLT have advanced from 117.78 to 120.71. As you can see in Figure 3, the original trade gave up its open profit and is now sitting with a loss of -$546 with a maximum of -$973 and needs a meaningful decline to ensue between now and April 21^st in order to generate a profit.Figure 3 – Original TLT option position (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

In Figure 4, we see that the adjusted trade – barring a sharp decline by bonds prior to 4/21 – will settle for a profit of $269. While this “ain’t all the money in the world”, it’s a lot better than generating a profit of +$742 and then riding it back down to a loss of -$973.

In any event the real point is to highlight that by trading options a trader can “adjust” positions along the way – in many cases allowing them to “lock in a profit” and then “let the adjusted position ride.”Figure 4 – Adjusted TLT option position with a “locked in” profit (Courtesy www.OptionsAnalysis.com)

In this case, experience teaches us that profits on option trades can be fleeting and that “locking in a profit” is rarely ever the “worst idea.”

Summary

In the course of three very different markets we find that:

1) Consolidation patterns and break outs from those patterns can often highlight terrific buying opportunities.

2) Persistent, long-term seasonal trends can help highlight unique trading opportunities

3) It is always important to remember that trends can reverse quickly and that by using option strategies it is possible to “adjust” a profitable position to lock in profits.

Now if you will excuse me I am going to go upstairs and lie down, um, sideways.

Jay Kaeppel

Four Things to Watch for Warning Signs

April 7, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

First things first: I am primarily a trend-follower (this is based on, a) the relative long-term benefits of following trends and b) my lack of ability to actually “predict” anything – but I digress).

As a trend-follower I love the fact that the stock market has been trending higher and the fact that there is so much “angst” regarding the “inevitable top.” Still, like a lot of investors I try to spot “early warning signs” whenever possible. Here are the four “things” I am following now for signs of trouble.

(See also Post-Election April and May)

Fidelity Select Electronics

In Figure 1 you see, a) the blow-off top of 1999-2000 and b) today. Are the two the same? I guess only time will tell. But the point is, I can’t help but think that if and when the bloom comes off of the electronics boom, overall trouble will follow. Here is hoping that I am not as correct here as I was here.Figure 1 – Ticker FSELX (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Just asking.

Transportation Index

As you can see in Figure 2, the Dow Transports has a history of making double tops which is followed by trouble in the broader market. Are we in the process of building another double top? And will trouble follow if we are? Dunno, hence the reason it is on my “Watch List” rather than on my “OH MY GOD SELL EVERYTHING NOW!!!!! List”.Figure 2 – Dow Transportation Index (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

Ticker XIV

Ticker XIV is an ETF that is designed to track inverse the VIX Index. As a refresher, the VIX Index tends to “spike” higher when stocks fall sharply and to decline when stocks are rising and/or relatively quiet. To put it in simpler terms, in a bull market ticker XIV will rise. As you can see in Figure 3 one might argue that XIV has gone “parabolic”. This is a potential warning sign (assuming you agree that the move is parabolic) as a parabolic price move for just about anything is almost invariably followed by, well, let’s just say, “not so pretty”.Figure 3 – Ticker XIV (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Let’s hope not. Because if it does qualify as parabolic that’s a very bad sign.

Ticker BID

This one may or may not be relevant but for what it is worth, Sotheby’s (ticker BID) has on several occasions served as something of a “leading indicator” at stock market tops (for the record it has also given some false signals, so this one is more for perspective purposes rather than actual trading purposes). Still, if this one tops out in conjunction with any or all of the above, it would likely serve as a useful warning sign.Figure 4 – Ticker BID (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)

Summary

There is no “urgent action” to be taken based on any of this. Bottom line: Nothing in this article should trigger you to run for the exits.

Still, it might be wise to at least take a look around and “locate the exit nearest you.”

You know, just in case.

Jay Kaeppel

Post-Election April and May

April 3, 2017Uncategorizedadmin

The best seven month period for the stock market historically extends from the end of October to the end of May. As we head into the “home stretch” of this period it is also interesting to note that the April/May period during post-election years has tended to be favorable in recent decades.

Figure 1 displays the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index during April and May of Post-Election years since the index was first calculated in 1981.

Post-Election Year	S&P Midcap400 April/May %+	Intra Period Max% Drawdown
1981	+5.2%	(-2.3%)
1985	+5.9%	(-2.0%)
1989	+10.5%	(-0.6%)
1993	+1.8%	(-4.6%)
1997	+11.6%	(-3.0%)
2001	+13.6%	(-5.9%)
2005	+1.9%	(-5.3%)
2009	+18.0%	(-7.5%)
2013	+2.9%	(-4.2%)
2017	?	?

Cumulative%	+96.6%
# times UP	9
# times DOWN	0
Average %	+7.9%	(-3.9%)
Median %	+5.9%	(-4.2%)
Max %	+18.0%	(-7.5%)
Min %	+1.8%	(-0.6%)

Figure 1 – Performance of S&P MidCap 400 Index during April/May of Post-Election Years (1981-2017)

As you can see in Figure 1 the average gain for the S&P MidCap 400 Index was +7.9% with a median gain of +5.9%. The worst performance to date was a gain of +1.8% in 1993. The smallest intra period drawdown was -0.6% in 1989 and the largest intra period drawdown was -7.6% in 2009 (2009 also posted the largest gain of +18.0%).

Figure 2 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the S&P Midcap 400 Index only during April and May of each post-election year starting in 1981 (the first year or which the Midcap index was calculated).

Figure 2 – Growth of $1,000 invested in S&P MidCap 400 Index only during April and May of post-election years (1981-2017)

Summary

Murphy’s Law being what it is, none of this should be taken as a sign that the MidCap Index is sure to rise between the end of March and the end of May in 2017 (especially given that it lost roughly -0.6% on the 1^st trading day of April). Still, I history proves to be an accurate guide investors may be wise to “ignore the news” and “ride the trend”.

Jay Kaeppel