• Tweet
• Email
• SumoMe

• Tweet
• Email

Hi, my name is Jay and I am a Seasonalaholic.  Now typically when someone confesses to being an “aholic” of some sort or another it because they recognize they have a problem and wish to correct it.  That’s not the case here.  In fact the “support” group that I belong to is not “Seasonalaholics Anonymous” but rather “Seasonalaholics Unanimous!” (OK, in the interest of full disclosure, so far I am the only member and yes, the monthly meetings aren’t terribly lively, but I digress).

Still I can’t help but think there are others out there who might join someday – especially after they consider things like the seasonal tendencies for retailing stocks.  To whit: what would have happened had an investor invested in Fidelity Select Sector Retailing fund (ticker FSRPX):

-During the months of February, March, October and November

-And then earned 1% of annualized interest while out of the market the other 8 months.

The answer is contained in Figure 1 which displays the growth of $1,000 invested as described above.

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in FSRPX during February, March, October, November (blue line) versus buying and holding the S&P 500 red line) since January 1988.

Now it is pretty impossible to not notice the, ahem, “slight drawdown” experienced during the October, November 2008 period.  Still, despite the fact that I have tried very hard scrub that particular time period from my memory bank, I still have some vague recollection that virtually no sector of the stock market was left unscathed during that period.  And the rebound has been pretty nice.

So is this really a viable strategy?  Well, under the category of “Everything is Relative”, Figure 2 displays the year-by-year performance of this “system” versus buying and holding the S&P 500.

Figure 2 – “System” versus S&P 500 Buy and Hold

Summary

The difference in the average annual return is not large (+10.9% for the system versus +9.6% for the S&P 500).  But this difference adds up over time.  Since January 1988 the system has gained +1,115% versus + 648% for the S&P 500 (while only being in the market 33% of the time. The true “numbers geeks” will notice that the standard deviation of annual returns for the system is only 2/3rds as large as that for the S&P 500 – i.e., much less volatility).

So I ask again, is this really a viable strategy?  Perhaps.  But the truth is that it can get a whole lot better – as I will detail the next time I write.

Jay Kaeppel